JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 9, 1996

A- de 1996

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Jose Salvador Roncancio

✓
Topic · hard data
Incompetencia De La Corte Para Conocer Sobre Decretos Reglamentarios.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Corte Constitucional
  • Incompetencia sobre decretos reglamentarios
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se rechazó la demanda de la referencia por falta de competencia para conocer sobre el contenido del Decreto Reglamentario 107 de 1996, dada la naturaleza del acto, pues los decretos que expide el Presidente de la República en desarrollo de las leyes -denominadas “leyes cuadro”, en cuanto se limitan a trazar las pautas o directrices generales con arreglo a las cuales debe actuar el Ejecutivo en la regulación de las materias allí contempladas-, son de naturaleza puramente administrativa.

Se trata entonces de actos que caen bajo la competencia del Consejo de Estado, según lo previsto en el artículo 237, numeral 2, de la Constitución, en cuanto no pueden ser incluidos como decretos con fuerza material legislativa y escapan, por ello, a la jurisdicción de esta Corte.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. decision, archivese el expediente.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.